Disclaimer: I am not a fan of Pawan Kalyan and if this review hurts your sentiments, it is merely due to the fact a spade is being called a spade and no malicious intent of hurting sentiments of people who cant see spade.
Now that I have given the disclaimer I am feeling light at heart. I don’t generally watch his movies during opening week. I avoid watching them in the first month too. I generally mitigate risk by reading reviews and consulting some victims before going to the theatre. This time I took an exception for two reasons. Second reason is I managed to get the tickets thanks to online booking system in multiplex theatres. (I voluntarily ignored the first reason as its my little secret)
Hey chikitha italiano pasta michealo. I know you did not understand this. Even I didn’t despite limited knowledge I have that pasta is Italian food. Movie is full of such dialogues which neither make sense to the story nor to the audience. Audience are saved because of this. Trouble lies in the rest of the movie which audience understand.
I did not watch the original hindi movie on which the story is based, Love Aaj Kal. Well to speak the truth the intent looked good going by the story. Story draws parallel between Love as it exists today and the olden days. Needless to say old love is nearly depicted as platonic and new one materialistic. Old love is depicted as firm in its existence and newer one opportunistic. This is what is supposed to be made as movie. You might ask why am I pissed off with this seemingly decent point? Well narration sucks!! Really!
It’s not new thing to us where two stories of past and present are merged in narration by the directors. Say for example Rang De Basanti does that very beautifully with out causing any boredom to the audience. Teenmaar does not seem to have such seamless integration in the narration which often bores the audience. The narration takes a dig at the confused state of today’s lovers, who don’t know what love means. To make matter worse it takes a dig at marriage system, when heroin realizes she is in love with other man a day after marriage. Sick, isn’t it? Pawan’s character has some resemblance to character played by ram charan in orange movie, I felt. He looked much more confused than Ram.
Music did not appeal a lot to me as I heard it frist time n screen. I am sure ANR would have felt bad for the way his hit song Basti Dorsani is used in this movie. Pawan’s action resembles that of what it was in Kushi/Jalsa despite the effort to show variation in the second character played of Arjun Palwai. Paresh Rawal holds real key to the movie with his narration of (G)olden love story to Hero. Trisha did justice to her role (despite the characterization blunder made) and might serve as crowd puller with her thigh and cleavage shows through out the movie. Other heroin neither had the scope nor the appeal. Director has left much to be desired as in the end I got confused if the message was supporting old love or newer version as they both seemed to have met same end.
Can some one help me understand what Teenmaar means and how its linked to the story?
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
What is Maturity truely?
Science defines Maturity as a psychological term used to indicate how a person responds to the circumstances or environment in an appropriate and adaptive manner.
Maturity is a tricky concept. It changes too often for the folks who are adaptive as the definition goes, It does not change quite so for the folks who are less adaptive and cognizant of the circumstantial changes. We often hear people saying "I am mature enough to decide" In fact we would have ourselves said the same dialogue at least once in life. How many times have repented that the decision we have taken should have been done in different manner? If we are matured then, why did the decision go wrong? Answer is simple, we are not matured enough for the decision when we took it and we are not cognizant of the matter at that point in time. And now with this failure if we are adaptive, we would become more mature than what we were at the time of decision.
Maturity grows with experience. It does not always grow with age. There by goes a saying that Young people knows rules and old people know exception to the rules. As we accumulate age as we live through life, we can say old men appear more matured than the younger folks, with some notable exceptions. I am more matured than what I was when I was teenager. When I was proposing to the girl I loved, I backed my self up thinking I am matured person. But looking back the act looks stupid now as I am more matured today than I was when I am in teenage. I am sure a vast majority of us would feel like undoing certain things we have done, if there is such a chance, isn't it. Similarly certain acts we commit today, might look similar way years down the line.
Is maturity attributable to mistakes we commit in life? It appears so. I commit a mistake in life and learn from the mistake and thus become more mature. But practically in the short span of life allotted, one cannot afford to commit all mistakes by himself and learn from them. So one can become more mature by learning from the mistakes other people make. One other major source of maturity is wise words from elders and from reading good books. Hindu system of education is based on this concept. The Rishis, who are learned people with high maturity levels, teach the students the knowledge and also document the wisdom in to various scriptures.
Absolute maturity is something that is difficult to comprehend as a concept. As indicated earlier if maturity is for ever growing phenomenon, then how can we define a absolute maturity at all. For material world it looks like a impossible thing to achieve. For spiritual world this is some thing that can be defined. Upanishads state "Brahmavid brhamaiva bhavati" meaning he who knows ParaBrahman or the ultimate reality becomes Brahman himself. So such people can be recognized as absolute matured ones.
Maturity is a tricky concept. It changes too often for the folks who are adaptive as the definition goes, It does not change quite so for the folks who are less adaptive and cognizant of the circumstantial changes. We often hear people saying "I am mature enough to decide" In fact we would have ourselves said the same dialogue at least once in life. How many times have repented that the decision we have taken should have been done in different manner? If we are matured then, why did the decision go wrong? Answer is simple, we are not matured enough for the decision when we took it and we are not cognizant of the matter at that point in time. And now with this failure if we are adaptive, we would become more mature than what we were at the time of decision.
Maturity grows with experience. It does not always grow with age. There by goes a saying that Young people knows rules and old people know exception to the rules. As we accumulate age as we live through life, we can say old men appear more matured than the younger folks, with some notable exceptions. I am more matured than what I was when I was teenager. When I was proposing to the girl I loved, I backed my self up thinking I am matured person. But looking back the act looks stupid now as I am more matured today than I was when I am in teenage. I am sure a vast majority of us would feel like undoing certain things we have done, if there is such a chance, isn't it. Similarly certain acts we commit today, might look similar way years down the line.
Is maturity attributable to mistakes we commit in life? It appears so. I commit a mistake in life and learn from the mistake and thus become more mature. But practically in the short span of life allotted, one cannot afford to commit all mistakes by himself and learn from them. So one can become more mature by learning from the mistakes other people make. One other major source of maturity is wise words from elders and from reading good books. Hindu system of education is based on this concept. The Rishis, who are learned people with high maturity levels, teach the students the knowledge and also document the wisdom in to various scriptures.
Absolute maturity is something that is difficult to comprehend as a concept. As indicated earlier if maturity is for ever growing phenomenon, then how can we define a absolute maturity at all. For material world it looks like a impossible thing to achieve. For spiritual world this is some thing that can be defined. Upanishads state "Brahmavid brhamaiva bhavati" meaning he who knows ParaBrahman or the ultimate reality becomes Brahman himself. So such people can be recognized as absolute matured ones.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Bhisma Ekadasi
Bheeshma Pitamaha or Devavrata is famously known for his oath of life long celibacy. He is one of the strongest characters in mahabharata and also a famous warrior, who could keep Arjuna also at bay on his day. But he is also a very renowned devotee of Lord Krishna. He is the one who proposes Krisna's name for top honor during RajaSuya Yaga performed by Dharmaraj. He also directs Kauravas to listen to Lord Krishna's words and stop war as Lord Krishna knows fully what would happen in the war. Bhisma figures in list of great devotees as given below sloka.
PRAHLADA-NARADA-PARASARA-PUNDARIKA-VYASA-AMBARISA-SUKA-SAUNAKA- BHISMA-DALBHYAN RUKMANGADA UDDHAVA-
VIBHISANA-PHALGUNA ADIN PUNYANI IMAN PARAMA BHAGAVATAN MANAMI (SRI PADYAVALI-52, TADBHAKTANAM MAHATMYAM)
"Prahlada, Narada, Parasara, Pundarika, Vyasa, Ambarisha, Sukhadeva Gosvami, Saunaka Rsi, Bismadeva, Balbhya Rsi, Rukmangada, Uddhava, Vibhisana, Arjuna, etc. to all of these great personalities, I pay my humble obeisances. "
Lord Krishna makes a promise not to touch weapon in the kurukshetrsa war and Bhisma challenges Lord himself stating that he would make Lord touch weapon. Kind hearted Almighty Krishna, wanted to give victory in this small challenge to his devotee Bhisma. One day when Bhisma starts killing Pandava army and Arjuna was not in a position to stop Bhisma. For a moment Krishna jumps out of charriot and takes weapon of sudarsana chakra pretending to kill Bhisma. In this way Lord Krishna displayed to world how much he valued Bhisma and his challenge.
When Bhisma is on his death bed(ampasayya) Krishna takes Dharmaraj to him so that Dharmaraj can learn more details of Dharma from the veteran. In the same context Bhisma gives Vishnu Sahasranama Stotra that is praying lord with 1000 names. Today Vishnu Sahasranama has become one acumen of the devotees who are on philosophical path. (Need to mention here that Late MS Subbalakshmi has given more popularity to it with her voice)
Bhisma who has gotten a boon from his father for his strong character, pitru bhakti and vow he has taken for his father. The boon is called svachanda Marana, means ability to time his death at his wish. During war he generously gives Pandavas secret to stop him in war. He waits on deathbed for auspicious Uttarayana Kalam and attains niryana on Astami of auspicious magha masa. The ekadasi that follows is named after him as Bhisma Ekadasi. It is believed that Fasting on this particular day and spending time in Lord Vishnu's names can free people from the sins.
PRAHLADA-NARADA-PARASARA-PUNDARIKA-VYASA-AMBARISA-SUKA-SAUNAKA- BHISMA-DALBHYAN RUKMANGADA UDDHAVA-
VIBHISANA-PHALGUNA ADIN PUNYANI IMAN PARAMA BHAGAVATAN MANAMI (SRI PADYAVALI-52, TADBHAKTANAM MAHATMYAM)
"Prahlada, Narada, Parasara, Pundarika, Vyasa, Ambarisha, Sukhadeva Gosvami, Saunaka Rsi, Bismadeva, Balbhya Rsi, Rukmangada, Uddhava, Vibhisana, Arjuna, etc. to all of these great personalities, I pay my humble obeisances. "
Lord Krishna makes a promise not to touch weapon in the kurukshetrsa war and Bhisma challenges Lord himself stating that he would make Lord touch weapon. Kind hearted Almighty Krishna, wanted to give victory in this small challenge to his devotee Bhisma. One day when Bhisma starts killing Pandava army and Arjuna was not in a position to stop Bhisma. For a moment Krishna jumps out of charriot and takes weapon of sudarsana chakra pretending to kill Bhisma. In this way Lord Krishna displayed to world how much he valued Bhisma and his challenge.
When Bhisma is on his death bed(ampasayya) Krishna takes Dharmaraj to him so that Dharmaraj can learn more details of Dharma from the veteran. In the same context Bhisma gives Vishnu Sahasranama Stotra that is praying lord with 1000 names. Today Vishnu Sahasranama has become one acumen of the devotees who are on philosophical path. (Need to mention here that Late MS Subbalakshmi has given more popularity to it with her voice)
Bhisma who has gotten a boon from his father for his strong character, pitru bhakti and vow he has taken for his father. The boon is called svachanda Marana, means ability to time his death at his wish. During war he generously gives Pandavas secret to stop him in war. He waits on deathbed for auspicious Uttarayana Kalam and attains niryana on Astami of auspicious magha masa. The ekadasi that follows is named after him as Bhisma Ekadasi. It is believed that Fasting on this particular day and spending time in Lord Vishnu's names can free people from the sins.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Major Bhanu Chander -- A friend who will be remembered
My first meeting with him was not necessarily cordial. Even though he is my batch mate he joined 6 months late and that makes me senior enough to rag him. I made him arrange things in my otherwise clumsy room and cover all the holes on antique doors of the hostel so that I need not suffer in chilly winter. I am sure he would have cursed me at that point. Bt story does not end there, there is a special bonding began then and there. He became a closest buddy for the next few years.
He used to tell me how badly he wanted to be in Indian Air Force as a pilot. I listened to every story which he unfolded about defence. May be I did not take all of them seriously as I had internal feeling that once he lands up with a lucrative high paying job, he would give his passion a break. But I was proved wrong in years to come and he was damn serious in becoming a pilot.
Every time I had to walk into to canteen (All night canteen) I used to catch up with him and try to pull his leg over some thing or other. His smile looked so genuine every time he smiled. He used to admit honestly that he is not getting gist some hard core courses and happily mugging up for exam’s sake. He is not the smartest in college but he was pretty close to the smart guys in his Bpharm course that he pursued like a Defense project.
Soon after graduation every one went chasing their future. Most of the guys future was lucrative job, higher education often called MS or MBA. He is one of the two guys I know who went on to pursue their unfamiliar passion. (Other being Ashis Panda who dedicated his life to social service) I was on one side happy with the decision he made and on the other side was nervous. Reason is obvious because of the risk he is carrying with so much dignity.
We used to catch up at times over telephonic calls and just chanced to meet on Vizag road when he is on way to his hometown. I was happy to discover that his trademark smile still the same despite the matured army captain status he earned at that point. Like every other Aam Admi I did not miss any chance to boast that friend is in army as captain in time killing conversations with other friends.
Six months ago he called me to inform that he is getting married. I was happy and sad. Happy for him for the time has come for marriage and sad that I can’t make it as I myself was getting married around same time. That was the last time we talked. We talked at length about many things from how he chanced to meet his sweetheart, how he became pilot in army which is his passion to his Honda car.
When a friend of mine revealed the news of his death I was dumbfounded. I can’t help recollecting all the things I recounted above. Tears rolled from my eyes. May be God does not let good and extraordinary guys to stay on earth for so long as they are closer to His heart Swami Vivekananda die not live for long. Srinivasa Ramanujam did not live until his 40s. Major Bhanu leaves world at tender age of 29 leaving many friends like me sad in this world. Written with tearful eyes an feeling of deep condolences.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
The Day when Right became wrong
Those were the days when King Parikshit is the ruler of the state. Its nearly 36 years after King Yudhistara left the kingdom to his grandson Parikshit to heavenly abode. Kali Purusha, who is the lead man for Kali Yuga did not dare to start his influences when Yudhistara was the king. Such was the power of the satvik and dharmic king.
A case was brought to King’s court for justice. Ramu and Somu were the parties to the case. Ramu sold his farm land to Somu few days and while ploughing the land Somu found a pot full of gold. Somu felt that the gold is legal propriety of Ramu as he merely paid for the land and not for the wealth underneath. Similarly Ramu felt that as the farm land is no longer his, the legal owner of the gold must be Somu. Both Ramu and Somu refused to lay hands on gold. King was pleasantly surprised at the Dharmic life his people are leading. He, how ever, wanted to give the case profound thought before delivering justice and so asked Ramu and Somu to assemble next morning in the court. Little did he know that the night would bring up new surprise at that point.
Kali purusha who was silent till that point sensed his time to exercise influence influence over people has finally come. He has got into minds of the people and started making them deviate from Dharmic life. Deviation from Dharmic life is first trait of Kali.
Next morning when the King appeared the case was completely different. Now both Ramu and Somu are fighting to become legal owners of the gold. King sensed something wrong as previous day they were relinquishing gold for same of Dharma. Serious contemplation and discussion with pundits gave him hint that Kali Yuga has started. He then ordered the gold to be handed over to king’s treasury, as any disputed property goes as per Dharma. He also put necessary steps in place to keep Kali in check. But all have gone in drain as Kali grew stronger and stronger.
A case was brought to King’s court for justice. Ramu and Somu were the parties to the case. Ramu sold his farm land to Somu few days and while ploughing the land Somu found a pot full of gold. Somu felt that the gold is legal propriety of Ramu as he merely paid for the land and not for the wealth underneath. Similarly Ramu felt that as the farm land is no longer his, the legal owner of the gold must be Somu. Both Ramu and Somu refused to lay hands on gold. King was pleasantly surprised at the Dharmic life his people are leading. He, how ever, wanted to give the case profound thought before delivering justice and so asked Ramu and Somu to assemble next morning in the court. Little did he know that the night would bring up new surprise at that point.
Kali purusha who was silent till that point sensed his time to exercise influence influence over people has finally come. He has got into minds of the people and started making them deviate from Dharmic life. Deviation from Dharmic life is first trait of Kali.
Next morning when the King appeared the case was completely different. Now both Ramu and Somu are fighting to become legal owners of the gold. King sensed something wrong as previous day they were relinquishing gold for same of Dharma. Serious contemplation and discussion with pundits gave him hint that Kali Yuga has started. He then ordered the gold to be handed over to king’s treasury, as any disputed property goes as per Dharma. He also put necessary steps in place to keep Kali in check. But all have gone in drain as Kali grew stronger and stronger.
Monday, November 29, 2010
I Hate Luv Stories
Disclaimer:This is not a movie review
There is no denying that I hate the concept of boy-girl love in the first place. Time and again I am reminded of this hatred in my subconscious mind through day to day experiences. This time a latest movie has reminded me of it. I just wanted to inspect why I hate love concept and this is what i came up with.
Platonic Love rarely exist:
Every time I hear love my eyes filter the content and transmit it to my brain as lust. It is not with out reason. Every love story we see begins with a good looking girl. People say love is something connected to heart. Surprisingly, most people fall in love with god looking girls only. So it says something that love is not merely heart oriented, it has substantial weightage to physical appearance.
Cheating of parents:
In the name of love the boy and girl invent multitude of excuses with parents to conceal the affair. They invent stories to be with lover and make poor parents buy those insane excuses. A boy who does not have an ounce of concern for parents declares he has an ocean of love for the girl he loves.
Decline in studies:
Studies usually take a huge hit due to juvenile love affairs. As the period during which love and study coincide, the youth pursue love rigorously than studies.
Nasty deeds: in name of love
Sad but unfortunate truth is that under the cover of love boys and girls are indulging in some nasty deeds that are inappropriate for their age and relation. Its painful to any decent human to elaborate on this and so closing it here.
Inter community:
As lovers pay more attention to physical and behavioral aspects only, most love affairs happen to start between people who belong to different communities. Conservative parents in India find it difficult to approve such love affairs and subsequent step of marriage outside their community.
Deception of Love:
Youth when in love trust the partner wholeheartedly. If one person in the couple has crooked intention then the life of the other would be at jeopardy. Mostly girls are at receiving end of this (through premarriage pregnancy or physical attacks by boys).
There is no denying that I hate the concept of boy-girl love in the first place. Time and again I am reminded of this hatred in my subconscious mind through day to day experiences. This time a latest movie has reminded me of it. I just wanted to inspect why I hate love concept and this is what i came up with.
Platonic Love rarely exist:
Every time I hear love my eyes filter the content and transmit it to my brain as lust. It is not with out reason. Every love story we see begins with a good looking girl. People say love is something connected to heart. Surprisingly, most people fall in love with god looking girls only. So it says something that love is not merely heart oriented, it has substantial weightage to physical appearance.
Cheating of parents:
In the name of love the boy and girl invent multitude of excuses with parents to conceal the affair. They invent stories to be with lover and make poor parents buy those insane excuses. A boy who does not have an ounce of concern for parents declares he has an ocean of love for the girl he loves.
Decline in studies:
Studies usually take a huge hit due to juvenile love affairs. As the period during which love and study coincide, the youth pursue love rigorously than studies.
Nasty deeds: in name of love
Sad but unfortunate truth is that under the cover of love boys and girls are indulging in some nasty deeds that are inappropriate for their age and relation. Its painful to any decent human to elaborate on this and so closing it here.
Inter community:
As lovers pay more attention to physical and behavioral aspects only, most love affairs happen to start between people who belong to different communities. Conservative parents in India find it difficult to approve such love affairs and subsequent step of marriage outside their community.
Deception of Love:
Youth when in love trust the partner wholeheartedly. If one person in the couple has crooked intention then the life of the other would be at jeopardy. Mostly girls are at receiving end of this (through premarriage pregnancy or physical attacks by boys).
Friday, November 12, 2010
Is being good same as never been caught doing wrong?
This is one of the lines of thought I had been thinking for last couple of months. Some of us pamper saying "I am a good person". People agree to what we say if they never found us doing any wrong deed and people disagree if we are caught doing something wrong in the past. Question here is, just because no one caught doing wrong in past, do we become good person. Is the nature of good defined by the society or the people surrounding us? Not very difficult to answer this question. Nevertheless I would like to grab this first chance to drive point home.
Society driven:
Society or other people can declare a person good or bad. I cant agree to the point that society can alone decide what is good and what is not. My gut feeling is with the way things are transitioning now-a-days we are not far away from the day when wrong would be declared by society as good and vice versa. I am reminded of a small story in this context
An old brahmin is taking home a goat as dakhsina for performing puja. Three thieves saw the poor fellow and wanted to have the goat from him for dinner. When the brahmin is on his way back home with goat, first thief stops him and asks why he is carrying a dog home. Brahmin dismissed his claim saying it is a goat. A while later, second thief encounters him and asks why he is taking a donkey home. Brahmin evidently taken aback by such comments, dismissed for second time such remark. Sometime later third thief stops the brahmin and asks what he is going to do with the mule he is carrying home. Brahmin was aghast by such remark and begins thinking that he is taking home a ghost which is appearing like goat, dog, mule and donkey to different people and discards the goat. Thieves make merry with goat meat for dinner.
Individual driven:
If society cant be trusted, can we rely on individual for deciding what is good and what is not? Not completely. A learned man who does not contradict with what is mentioned in dharma shatras can be trusted for deciding what is good and what is not. Even the learned sages like Gautama and Manu who have drafted Dharma shastras, clearly stated in them that if they by mistake contradict anywhere with Veda then the Veda takes overriding precedence. Problem with relying fully on individual's decision on what is good and what is not is, people have innate tendency to justify the wrong deeds with some emotional or logical reasoning to make them look good. Just the way it is shown in movies, hero turns into thief and it would be justified by circumstances or hero marries heroin against will of parents in the name of sacred love. But the justification does not make a wrong deed right.
Then what is good:
Vedas form the basis for the acts individuals have to perform as per the context they are in (varna as well as ashrama) and deeds which are banished. How ever as Vedas are not easily accessible to everyone, great sages who have digested gist of the Vedas came up with Dharma Shashtras. These are easily accessible information for every one to know what is right and what is not. These deeds when followed to the spirit can be termed as good acts.
Final word:
I wud like to conclude this article with a small story, which I probably repeatedly told to some of you folks.
A teacher has imparted all the knowledge required to his pupil and while sending them back home he wanted to understand how many understood the content clearly. He called his students and gave each of them a banana to eat with a precondition that it should be eaten when no one is watching. One student went into a closed room and sat under the bed while eating it. Other student went into a forest and ate it sitting on a branch of tree. Other student went into pond and ate it while swimming. But the best student did not eat the banana and came to the guru. When questioned abt it, he replied that he could not eat it as no matter how far he has gone, there is God Almighty watching what he is doing. Guru felt proud and declared thats the gist of the education he imparted and so he is extremely confident that his student will not perform any wrong deed anytime as he knows clearly that God i watching him all the time.
Society driven:
Society or other people can declare a person good or bad. I cant agree to the point that society can alone decide what is good and what is not. My gut feeling is with the way things are transitioning now-a-days we are not far away from the day when wrong would be declared by society as good and vice versa. I am reminded of a small story in this context
An old brahmin is taking home a goat as dakhsina for performing puja. Three thieves saw the poor fellow and wanted to have the goat from him for dinner. When the brahmin is on his way back home with goat, first thief stops him and asks why he is carrying a dog home. Brahmin dismissed his claim saying it is a goat. A while later, second thief encounters him and asks why he is taking a donkey home. Brahmin evidently taken aback by such comments, dismissed for second time such remark. Sometime later third thief stops the brahmin and asks what he is going to do with the mule he is carrying home. Brahmin was aghast by such remark and begins thinking that he is taking home a ghost which is appearing like goat, dog, mule and donkey to different people and discards the goat. Thieves make merry with goat meat for dinner.
Individual driven:
If society cant be trusted, can we rely on individual for deciding what is good and what is not? Not completely. A learned man who does not contradict with what is mentioned in dharma shatras can be trusted for deciding what is good and what is not. Even the learned sages like Gautama and Manu who have drafted Dharma shastras, clearly stated in them that if they by mistake contradict anywhere with Veda then the Veda takes overriding precedence. Problem with relying fully on individual's decision on what is good and what is not is, people have innate tendency to justify the wrong deeds with some emotional or logical reasoning to make them look good. Just the way it is shown in movies, hero turns into thief and it would be justified by circumstances or hero marries heroin against will of parents in the name of sacred love. But the justification does not make a wrong deed right.
Then what is good:
Vedas form the basis for the acts individuals have to perform as per the context they are in (varna as well as ashrama) and deeds which are banished. How ever as Vedas are not easily accessible to everyone, great sages who have digested gist of the Vedas came up with Dharma Shashtras. These are easily accessible information for every one to know what is right and what is not. These deeds when followed to the spirit can be termed as good acts.
Final word:
I wud like to conclude this article with a small story, which I probably repeatedly told to some of you folks.
A teacher has imparted all the knowledge required to his pupil and while sending them back home he wanted to understand how many understood the content clearly. He called his students and gave each of them a banana to eat with a precondition that it should be eaten when no one is watching. One student went into a closed room and sat under the bed while eating it. Other student went into a forest and ate it sitting on a branch of tree. Other student went into pond and ate it while swimming. But the best student did not eat the banana and came to the guru. When questioned abt it, he replied that he could not eat it as no matter how far he has gone, there is God Almighty watching what he is doing. Guru felt proud and declared thats the gist of the education he imparted and so he is extremely confident that his student will not perform any wrong deed anytime as he knows clearly that God i watching him all the time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
